<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>exparte Archives - Divorce 661 Santa Clarita Divorce Paralegal | Valencia Divorce Paralegal | Santa Clarita Valley Divorce Paralegal</title>
	<atom:link href="https://divorce661.com/tag/exparte/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://divorce661.com/tag/exparte/</link>
	<description>Santa Clarita CA Divorce Paralegal &#124; Santa Clarita Divorce Mediation &#124; Valencia CA Divorce Paralegal &#124; Stevenson Ranch CA Divorce Paralegal &#124; Canyon Country CA Divorce Paralegal &#124; Saugus CA Divorce Paralegal &#124; Santa Clarita Divorce &#124; Valencia Divorce &#124; Saugus Divorce &#124; Stevenson Ranch Divorce &#124; Canyon Country Divorce &#124; Castaic Divorce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 03:34:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>California Divorce Ex-Parte Must Be True Emergencies</title>
		<link>https://divorce661.com/california-divorce-ex-parte-must-true-emergencies/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Blankenship]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 03:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce Legal Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce661]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ex-parte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exparte]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorce661.com/?p=11971</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The way Divorce Ex-Parte hearings are being decided are changing. I am seeing a trend where Judges are making sure that ...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://divorce661.com/california-divorce-ex-parte-must-true-emergencies/">California Divorce Ex-Parte Must Be True Emergencies</a> appeared first on <a href="https://divorce661.com">Divorce 661 Santa Clarita Divorce Paralegal | Valencia Divorce Paralegal | Santa Clarita Valley Divorce Paralegal</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way Divorce Ex-Parte hearings are being decided are changing. I am seeing a trend where Judges are making sure that the divorce Ex-Parte hearings are true emergencies.</p>
<p>I have sent several clients down to court on Divorce Ex-Parte hearings lately and I have noticed a trend. The judges are being more critical of the Ex-Parte hearings and if they are not true emergencies, they are denying the Ex Parte hearing.</p>
<p><script src="//fast.wistia.com/embed/medias/jlwe55hake.jsonp" async></script><script src="//fast.wistia.com/assets/external/E-v1.js" async></script></p>
<div class="wistia_responsive_padding" style="padding:50.94% 0 0 0;position:relative;">
<div class="wistia_responsive_wrapper" style="height:100%;left:0;position:absolute;top:0;width:100%;">
<div class="wistia_embed wistia_async_jlwe55hake videoFoam=true" style="height:100%;width:100%">&nbsp;</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>What is troubling about this is that the bar for being a true emergency is getting higher and higher. Before, financial difficulties were considered emergencies. The last client i sent in Ex Parte was told by an attorney that they had a good Ex-Parte divorce issue in that they were about to be evicted because the spouse moved out of the rental home and stopped paying the rent while the wife was at home with the 2 kids and coming up on Christmas is facing eviction. Despicable!</p>
<p>In any case, we sent her down on emergency Ex Parte motion to get her rent caught up and the judge denied it flat out.  Even the attorney that referred this client to us was shocked that they did not consider the matter since she was about to be evicted.</p>
<p>I make a joke that unless there is &#8220;blood on the floor&#8221; which my mom would say while telling a story and she realized nobody was listening, the ex parte hearings are not being heard.</p>
<p>Additionally, before the judge would deny the ex parte hearing, but then set the matter on the regular calendar, now they are denying the ex parte hearing and telling the party who filed to file their case on the normal calendar.</p>
<p>The issue here is that if the judge continued the ex parte hearing and set a new date, the court fees the person paid would be considered paid. By the court denying the ex parte hearing and not continuing the hearing or setting is on the calendar forces the party filing the ex parte to pay the filing fees twice.</p>
<p>This is not fair.</p>
<p>Let me explain&#8230; So you have an emergency you feel warrants an ex parte motion. You file the motion Ex parte and it is denied. You paid your fees for that hearing, but because the judge felt it did not warrant an emergency, you have to re-file completely and pay the fees again which can be as much as $115 each time.</p>
<p>Sometimes, just not fair&#8230;</p>
<p>We handle Request For Orders both on the regular calendar and Ex-Parte. Please call for a free phone consultation to discuss your situation.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://divorce661.com/california-divorce-ex-parte-must-true-emergencies/">California Divorce Ex-Parte Must Be True Emergencies</a> appeared first on <a href="https://divorce661.com">Divorce 661 Santa Clarita Divorce Paralegal | Valencia Divorce Paralegal | Santa Clarita Valley Divorce Paralegal</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
